I am a photographer, and i just noticed this. This is a fake because the shadow should be a forty five degree to his rear unless they used three light sources which is how you would do this in a studio to capture the reflection in the mask but not the film crew. This is a fake. now i wonder if they ever really went to the moon. This is like the real life Capricorn One.
My name is Daniel Price and I am ten years of age and a really big fan of yours. This past summer I went with my father to the Kennedy Space center to see the launch of the space shuttle Endeavor, it was quite a venture. WE also were in Baltimore, MD a few weeks to see you at your book review and to buy a copy, however we missed you by a few minutes, I was very sad not to have a chance to see you, talk with you and take pictures.
I also have the wallpaper image of you on my bed room wall, It shows me what I would like to do one day. If you could please let me know where your next book signing will be we will come to see you.
Thank you,
Daniel C Price (I am also a Boy Scout and a Honor Student)
Are you a professional photograher, or do you just own a camera and take a few snaps? I find it difficult to believe a fellow professional would talk such rubbish – you will never get rich taking photographs if this is the limit of your knowledge. Ever heard of available light, which this photograph is obviously taken in? (Or do you perhaps think they took studio lights all the way to the Moon just to take photographs?). Studio lights have nothing to do with it. Why on earth should the shadow be at 45 degrees to the rear of the subject? Its position will depend entirely on the position of the lighting (in this case the sun), which is out of shot above and to the right (as you look at it) of the subject. It is in exactly the right position to be able to see a reflection in the visor, because it leaves the visor in the shade whilst brightly illuminating the photograher and the lunar module. If it was in front, causing the shadow to be 45 degrees behind Aldrin, then it would be reflected in the visor, which acts like a convex mirror (look it up if you don’t understand) and completely dazzle anything else reflected in it. You conspiracy theorists are all the same – you look for evidence to suit your theories and when you find there isn’t any, you make it up. Get a life!!!
Loading ...
September 24th, 2009 at 6:55 pm
I am a photographer, and i just noticed this. This is a fake because the shadow should be a forty five degree to his rear unless they used three light sources which is how you would do this in a studio to capture the reflection in the mask but not the film crew. This is a fake. now i wonder if they ever really went to the moon. This is like the real life Capricorn One.
October 14th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Dear Mr. Aldrin:
My name is Daniel Price and I am ten years of age and a really big fan of yours. This past summer I went with my father to the Kennedy Space center to see the launch of the space shuttle Endeavor, it was quite a venture. WE also were in Baltimore, MD a few weeks to see you at your book review and to buy a copy, however we missed you by a few minutes, I was very sad not to have a chance to see you, talk with you and take pictures.
I also have the wallpaper image of you on my bed room wall, It shows me what I would like to do one day. If you could please let me know where your next book signing will be we will come to see you.
Thank you,
Daniel C Price (I am also a Boy Scout and a Honor Student)
October 15th, 2009 at 1:19 am
eddie-joe young, that point has been discussed and debunked to death. You are a moron if you believe the moon landings were fake.
November 12th, 2009 at 7:45 pm
Are you a professional photograher, or do you just own a camera and take a few snaps? I find it difficult to believe a fellow professional would talk such rubbish – you will never get rich taking photographs if this is the limit of your knowledge. Ever heard of available light, which this photograph is obviously taken in? (Or do you perhaps think they took studio lights all the way to the Moon just to take photographs?). Studio lights have nothing to do with it. Why on earth should the shadow be at 45 degrees to the rear of the subject? Its position will depend entirely on the position of the lighting (in this case the sun), which is out of shot above and to the right (as you look at it) of the subject. It is in exactly the right position to be able to see a reflection in the visor, because it leaves the visor in the shade whilst brightly illuminating the photograher and the lunar module. If it was in front, causing the shadow to be 45 degrees behind Aldrin, then it would be reflected in the visor, which acts like a convex mirror (look it up if you don’t understand) and completely dazzle anything else reflected in it. You conspiracy theorists are all the same – you look for evidence to suit your theories and when you find there isn’t any, you make it up. Get a life!!!
February 12th, 2010 at 11:50 pm
Guys, chill out please. Eddie-Joe is clearly either being sarcastic or trolling. I mean, the Capricorn One reference? Hilarious! Good stuff, EJY.